[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14287789#comment-14287789
]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-3480:
----------------------------------------
Wow, it seems like the switch from TreeMap to HashMap made a bigger difference
for your test case than mine.
For your test case how long does the call to balance take when everything is
already balanced?
> GroupBalancer improvements
> --------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-3480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3480
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Keith Turner
> Assignee: Keith Turner
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-3480-1.patch, ACCUMULO-3480-2.patch,
> ACCUMULO-3480-3.patch
>
>
> [~bfloss] made the following comment on ACCUMULO-3439
> bq. The balance method in GroupBalancer does nothing if there are any
> incoming migrations. You probably want to check the incoming migrations and
> only bail out if any of those migrations are for the specific table that the
> GroupBalancer is managing.
> I chatted w/ Brian and he also mentioned that the group balancer should
> record time at the end, and not the beginning.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
