[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14375161#comment-14375161
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-3681:
------------------------------------------

Github user joshelser commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/24#issuecomment-84702521
  
    Thanks for the explanation, Ed, that makes sense to me!


> Avoid string format injection problems
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3681
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Christopher Tubbs
>            Assignee: Ed Coleman
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> In log4j, we could write {{log.debug(e,e);}}, where {{e}} was an 
> {{Exception}} type, whenever we didn't have a more specific message to put 
> in. Log4j would convert the first parameter to a {{String}}.
> With the migration to slf4j, this no longer works. Instead, slf4j requires 
> the first parameter to be a format string. So, in many places, we've 
> converted these to something like {{log.debug(e.toString(),e);}}.
> However, the key point here is that it's not just _any_ string, it's 
> specifically a *format* string. So, this will be problematic if 
> {{e.toString()}} actually contains format instructions like {{The input 
> "\{\}" is not a valid table name}}.
> To avoid these kinds of problems, we should take care to replace these with a 
> better option:
> # {{log.debug("Some explicit message", e);}} (preferred)
> # {{log.debug("", e);}}
> # {{log.debug("{}", e.getMessage(), e);}}
> # {{log.debug("{}", e.toString(), e);}}
> # {{log.debug("{}", e, e);}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to