[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-2362.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Won't Fix
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.7.0)

Haven't done anything. Needs to be rescoped, invalid until then.

> Reduce blocking in client API (Tables)
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2362
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2362
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.4, 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>
> Presently, the {{Tables}} class contains a static map of instance to ZooCache 
> that *many* of the classes in the client API use. The problem with this is 
> that many of the methods on ZooCache ultimately are synchronized. When 
> multiple threads using Connectors, TableOperations, Scanners/BatchScanners, 
> and BatchWriters against the same Accumulo instance, you currently have a 
> massive synchronization problem.
> We should give some thought to heavy, concurrent access to Accumulo client 
> API calls within the same JVM. Consideration should also be given to the 
> consistency of wrapping zookeeper with a cache like is presently done.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to