[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14486136#comment-14486136
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-3602:
------------------------------------------

Github user keith-turner commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/25#issuecomment-91046228
  
    > Also, you have to stuff the input information in the Configuration any 
ways so that the client can create all of the input splits (and thus store them 
in memory) before submitting the jrrb.
    
    True in some cases.  I was thinking in many cases that a user provided 
function could deterministically generate a large number of ranges from a small 
amount of configuration. 


> BatchScanner optimization for AccumuloInputFormat
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3602
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.6.2
>            Reporter: Eugene Cheipesh
>            Assignee: Eugene Cheipesh
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Currently {{AccumuloInputFormat}} produces a split for reach {{Range}} 
> specified in the configuration. Some table indexing schemes, for instance 
> z-order geospacial index, produce large number of small ranges resulting in 
> large number of splits. This is specifically a concern when using 
> {{AccumuloInputFormat}} as a source for Spark RDD where each Split is mapped 
> to an RDD partition.
> Large number of small RDD partitions leads to poor parallism on read and high 
> overhead on processing. A desirable alternative is to group ranges by tablet 
> into a single split and use {{BatchScanner}} to produce the records. Grouping 
> by tablets is useful because it represents Accumulos attempt to distributed 
> stored records and can be influance by the user through table splits.
> The grouping functionality already exists in the internal {{TabletLocator}} 
> class. 
> Current proposal is to modify {{AbstractInputFormat}} such that it generates 
> either {{RangeInputSplit}} or {{MultiRangeInputSplit}} based on a new setting 
> in {{InputConfigurator}}.  {{AccumuloInputFormat}} would then be able to 
> inspect the type of the split and instantiate an appropriate reader.
> The functinality of {{TabletLocator}} should be exposed as a public API in 
> 1.7 as it is useful for optimizations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to