[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christopher Tubbs updated ACCUMULO-3548:
----------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.8.0)
                   1.6.3
                   1.7.0
                   1.5.3

> Classes leaked through InstanceOperations into public API methods
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3548
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5.3, 1.7.0, 1.6.3
>
>
> Looking through ACCUMULO-3204, I noticed that we're (inadvertently?) using a 
> few classes in the public API without having them defined in the public API.
> {{connector.instanceOperations().getActiveScans()}} is what uses ActiveScan 
> in the public API. This provides a way for users to be relying on something 
> that should be stable that doesn't hold us to providing stability. ActiveScan 
> also leaks Column and KeyExtent.
> * {{activeScan.getColumns()}}
> * {{activeScan.getExtent()}}
> It looks like {{ActiveCompaction}} does similar things.
> We should make sure these classes are in the public API (force us to ensure 
> they stay stable).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to