[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14487384#comment-14487384
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-3602:
------------------------------------------

Github user keith-turner commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/25#issuecomment-91240448
  
    Another possible option for supporting a large number of ranges is to add a 
method called `setRangesFile(conf, hdfsRangesFile)`.   A method like this could 
be added later and would not change any of the API added in this PR, i think it 
would only change implementation.  I think this can achieve the same goal I was 
trying to achieve with the functor approach.  I think its easier to understand 
and can be easily  added after these changes are released.   
    
    It is similar to 
[ACCUMULO-507](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-507), but avoids 
the problem of Accumulo code creating a file that can not be reliably cleaned 
up.  The user creates the file, knows its exists, and can clean it up.


> BatchScanner optimization for AccumuloInputFormat
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3602
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3602
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.6.2
>            Reporter: Eugene Cheipesh
>            Assignee: Eugene Cheipesh
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Currently {{AccumuloInputFormat}} produces a split for reach {{Range}} 
> specified in the configuration. Some table indexing schemes, for instance 
> z-order geospacial index, produce large number of small ranges resulting in 
> large number of splits. This is specifically a concern when using 
> {{AccumuloInputFormat}} as a source for Spark RDD where each Split is mapped 
> to an RDD partition.
> Large number of small RDD partitions leads to poor parallism on read and high 
> overhead on processing. A desirable alternative is to group ranges by tablet 
> into a single split and use {{BatchScanner}} to produce the records. Grouping 
> by tablets is useful because it represents Accumulos attempt to distributed 
> stored records and can be influance by the user through table splits.
> The grouping functionality already exists in the internal {{TabletLocator}} 
> class. 
> Current proposal is to modify {{AbstractInputFormat}} such that it generates 
> either {{RangeInputSplit}} or {{MultiRangeInputSplit}} based on a new setting 
> in {{InputConfigurator}}.  {{AccumuloInputFormat}} would then be able to 
> inspect the type of the split and instantiate an appropriate reader.
> The functinality of {{TabletLocator}} should be exposed as a public API in 
> 1.7 as it is useful for optimizations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to