[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14618918#comment-14618918
]
Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-3409:
--------------------------------------
Thanks, Eric.
I did pull up IANA records and we were already using some "assigned" ports, but
I would assume we're ok..
{noformat}
palace-4 9995 tcp Palace-4
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
palace-4 9995 udp Palace-4
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
palace-5 9996 tcp Palace-5
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
palace-5 9996 udp Palace-5
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
palace-6 9997 tcp Palace-6
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
palace-6 9997 udp Palace-6
[Douglas_Crockford] [Douglas_Crockford]
distinct32 9998 tcp Distinct32
[Anoop_Tewari] [Anoop_Tewari]
distinct32 9998 udp Distinct32
[Anoop_Tewari] [Anoop_Tewari]
distinct 9999 tcp distinct
[Anoop_Tewari] [Anoop_Tewari]
distinct 9999 udp distinct
[Anoop_Tewari] [Anoop_Tewari]
{noformat}
> Move default ports out of ephemeral range
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-3409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3409
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: incompatible
> Fix For: 1.8.0
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-3409.patch
>
>
> We have two components with default ports in the [IANA ephemeral
> range|http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335#section-6]: the GC at 50091 and the
> monitor at 50095. We should move these to not be in the ephemeral range.
> This change will be disruptive, particularly for the monitor UI port, so we
> should wait for a major release and include a release note that explains how
> to maintain the previous port choice using configuration settings in
> accumulo-site.xml.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)