[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15378438#comment-15378438
]
Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4110:
--------------------------------------
+1 minor clarification that startLogMaker would already be running by the time
we're writing mutations. Essentially this is due to the changes in
ACCUMULO-3423. We want to create a second WAL so that when we want to roll the
current WAL, we don't have to wait on the NN to create the new WAL -- we just
switch the state in memory.
I couldn't come up with a better way to verify things that wouldn't require new
RPCs. I think the poll+check is fine.
> WALSunnyDayIT is repeatedly failing
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-4110
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4110
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: test
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Michael Wall
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
> {code}
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 13.035 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.WALSunnyDayIT
> test(org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.WALSunnyDayIT) Time elapsed: 13.034
> sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: should have 3 WALs after roll expected:<3> but
> was:<2>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> at
> org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.WALSunnyDayIT.test(WALSunnyDayIT.java:113)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
