[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15485990#comment-15485990
]
Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4177:
--------------------------------------
FWIW, master is officially on minJdk=8. It would be neat to run a little
benchmark to see what kind of a difference TinyLFU would make. Do you have any
examples of tests that other projects used, [~ben.manes]?
> TinyLFU-based BlockCache
> ------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-4177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4177
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ben Manes
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-4177.patch
>
>
> [LruBlockCache|https://github.com/apache/accumulo/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/blockfile/cache/LruBlockCache.java]
> appears to be based on HBase's. I currently have a patch being reviewed in
> [HBASE-15560|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15560] that replaces
> the pseudo Segmented LRU with the TinyLFU eviction policy. That should allow
> the cache to make [better
> predictions|https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Efficiency] based on
> frequency and recency, such as improved scan resistance. The implementation
> uses [Caffeine|https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine], the successor to
> Guava's cache, to provide concurrency and keep the patch small.
> Full details are in the JIRA ticket. I think it should be easy to port if
> there is interest.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
