[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16150850#comment-16150850
 ] 

Michael Miller commented on ACCUMULO-4662:
------------------------------------------

After ACCUMULO-4699 is fixed, refactoring of String -> Table.ID for 
sourceTableId in SequentialWorkAssigner will need to be done.  

> Fix ambiguous table references
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4662
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Miller
>            Assignee: Michael Miller
>             Fix For: 1.7.4, 1.8.2, 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While working on ACCUMULO-3238, I noticed a few places where we use the 
> ambiguous variable: 
> {code}String table{code}  
> This is problematic since it is not clear what the variable is actually 
> referring to.  It can be referring to either a tableId or tableName both of 
> which are Strings but different in values Zookeeper.  Typically the actual 
> value of the variable can be derived from surrounding code but this is not 
> always the case. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to