[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16159074#comment-16159074
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-2445:
--------------------------------------

I'm confused -- fluo-bytes is empty? There was never actually any code? Just an 
idea?

I would just be concerned about using some class that we provide directly 
without making sure it's really fleshed out. Mentioning fluo was just because I 
assumed that such a "stable" bytes-centric API was already existing which we 
could leverage. If that doesn't exist, we would just have to make sure what we 
have now is stable/thorough.

> API should use collection-of-bytes representation instead of Text
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2445
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2445
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Sean Busbey
>            Assignee: Christopher Tubbs
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Right now we use Text as a container for bytes rather than as a UTF8 
> representation of a string. This results in some gymnastics when people wish 
> to use byte sequences that are not valid UTF8 (see ACCUMULO-2437).
> We should use some representation of plain bytes (ideally byte[] or 
> ByteBuffer) and deprecate the use of Text so we can remove it later.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to