volmasoft commented on issue #11: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo-docker/issues/11#issuecomment-623731813
I'm not sure if progress on this has stalled, it seems like it may have for now? If it was acceptable, I'd like to look at whether we can get 2 changes in before we release the first official version and we still potentially need to resolve the naming convention. ### Reduce the image size This configuration suffers from the same issues as accumulo-proxy, see the issue discussion here: https://github.com/apache/accumulo-proxy/issues/22 My intention is to allow the accumulo-proxy discussion to run it's course and then look at folding in the same code to accumulo-docker for consistency. ### Potential props change Another discussion I kicked off is here: https://github.com/apache/accumulo-proxy/issues/21 I personally think changing the approach to supplying properties would be a great thing but I don't want accumulo-proxy and accumulo-docker to be inconsistent. ### Tag naming/versioning convention Looking at the e-mail thread it seems we haven't fully settled on a naming and versioning convention for the Docker image tags. I'm happy to continue discussions across different issues/pulls, or happy to carve some time out and have a slack conversation if people would find that easier? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
