ctubbsii commented on issue #1794: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1794#issuecomment-730525348
I think this kind of thing should be a "major release" kind of change, to avoid breaking too many expectations with 2.x. But, I'm not sure it's necessary, if we can get leverage modules. It also may introduce too much API churn, if we rename the packages to match our convention of having package names match artifact names. If we don't rename packages, it can create jar sealing violations or user confusion when trying to locate which jar they need on their class path for a given API. This was originally something I had wanted to do for 2.0.0, but didn't make it in. I think it could be something to consider for 3.0.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
