EdColeman commented on issue #1893: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1893#issuecomment-771065722
It seems that there were multiple packaging decisions that were originally made with the FATE design - I believe the stated goal was that FATEs could become a stand-alone product outside of Accumulo. Should we revisit that? If moving the method would impact FATE serialization should other changes be made concurrently so that FATE serialization would only change once? Also, I believe that during upgrades it is necessary to insure that no FATE transactions are pending or the upgrade aborts - so changes in serialization should not be a factor between upgrades. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
