dlmarion commented on pull request #2096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2096#issuecomment-842381842


   > it seems that the way the external compactions are exposed through to the 
user in the compaction configuration is through the specially named 
externalQueue, which seems to be a special feature of the default compaction 
service. Is that correct?
   
   Currently, yes. I believe the intention was to allow for users to configure 
compactions on their table(s) such that some could run internally (say, smaller 
ones) and other (larger) externally.
   
   > I'm wondering if there are ways this could be made a bit more modular and 
the configuration a bit more explicit, so that the default compaction service 
isn't so monolithic, and users can very explicitly swap out the external 
executor implementation for another one.
   
   I don't think that one of our goals was to create a pluggable external 
implementation. It's possible it was, I just don't remember that. Is that 
something we want?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to