dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #2467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2467#discussion_r802585688
##########
File path:
shell/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/shell/commands/FateCommand.java
##########
@@ -136,7 +140,29 @@ public int execute(final String fullCommand, final
CommandLine cl, final Shell s
getZooReaderWriter(context, siteConfig,
cl.getOptionValue(secretOption.getOpt()));
ZooStore<FateCommand> zs = new ZooStore<>(path, zk);
- if ("fail".equals(cmd)) {
+ if ("fail-live".equals(cmd)) {
Review comment:
> might be taking the metaphor too far here
I'm not convinced that it's the right one as it's
[documented](https://accumulo.apache.org/docs/2.x/administration/fate). For me,
surgery is manually inserting / updating / deleting rows from the metadata
table.
> Right now, this seems very risky to add, especially since we haven't even
ironed out the kinks in the other recent changes in these areas.
ExternalCompactions ITs are still flaky, and now FateIT is failing too.
I"m starting to think the issue is ZK based on the information you added to
in #2463 and the fact that FateIT has one test.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
