cshannon commented on issue #1327:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1327#issuecomment-1416772087

   I have started looking into this and doing research on how to go about 
implementing it. I plan to try and break this up into sub-tasks to implement 
smaller changes at a time. Some things of course won't be possible in isolation 
but I will break it up the best I can.  Also, because of the scope of the issue 
I don't see it being ready for 3.0.0 so should we un-assign this from 3.0.0? I 
could see some smaller changes being done for 3.0.0 but probably not the entire 
feature.
   
   Also, one question I had as I've been diving into this is will the goal here 
to be to ONLY  support no-chop merges or is there a desire to preserve the 
current behavior of merges (maybe a flag or something to specify the type)? 
   
   I could see scenarios where a user would want to actually do a merge the 
current way (and take the performance penalty that comes with it) but I'm 
thinking we probably don't need to preserve the current merge strategy as an 
option because a user could also just simply run a compaction after a merge and 
accomplish the same thing if desired.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to