ctubbsii commented on code in PR #3278:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/3278#discussion_r1160252473
##########
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/log/LogSorter.java:
##########
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ public class LogSorter {
VolumeManager fs;
AccumuloConfiguration conf;
- private final Map<String,LogProcessor> currentWork =
- Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<String,LogProcessor>());
+ // access must synchronize on currentWork to guard against concurrent updates
+ private final Map<String,LogProcessor> currentWork = new HashMap<>();
Review Comment:
Unless we're fixing a bug, I'd rather not risk introducing a new bug in 1.10
by changing concurrency assumptions in a patch release. Is this actually a bug,
or just unneeded? I don't think it's a performance issue in here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
