ctubbsii commented on issue #3559: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/3559#issuecomment-1654571481
> @ctubbsii I think using records for serialization deserves its own issue if it does not have one. It was mentioned on https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/2473#issuecomment-1033230922, which is an overarching issue about refactoring FATE. This issue and that one probably overlap a lot, as they are both very high level and not clear on details. There may be smaller bits that can be separated out and worked on independently. However, I don't want to create any new issues, given that there's already 2 broadly themed ones, and it's not clear what the path forward is going to be. I think the ideas between the two tickets need to be thought through, so a clear design can be proposed. At that point, it might make sense to create sub-issues to track the individual tasks as part of working towards the overall goal. Another thing to consider: we have a whole `accumulo.*` namespace. If the metadata isn't appropriate, then it's possible another table in that namespace could be... as long as we don't create any bootstrapping issues between which tables come online first. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
