keith-turner commented on code in PR #4142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/4142#discussion_r1446098462
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/util/compaction/CompactionJobPrioritizer.java:
##########
@@ -20,40 +20,56 @@
import java.util.Comparator;
+import org.apache.accumulo.core.data.TableId;
+import org.apache.accumulo.core.metadata.schema.Ample;
import org.apache.accumulo.core.spi.compaction.CompactionJob;
import org.apache.accumulo.core.spi.compaction.CompactionKind;
+import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+
public class CompactionJobPrioritizer {
public static final Comparator<CompactionJob> JOB_COMPARATOR =
Comparator.comparingInt(CompactionJob::getPriority)
.thenComparingInt(job -> job.getFiles().size()).reversed();
- public static short createPriority(CompactionKind kind, int totalFiles, int
compactingFiles) {
+ public static short createPriority(TableId tableId, CompactionKind kind, int
totalFiles,
+ int compactingFiles) {
+
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(totalFiles >= 0, "totalFiles is negative %s",
totalFiles);
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(compactingFiles >= 0, "compactingFiles is
negative %s",
+ compactingFiles);
- int prio = totalFiles + compactingFiles;
+ // This holds the two bits used to encode the priority of the table.
Review Comment:
Yeah it could. We could add the table id from that work into this
calculation once its merged
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
