[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christopher Tubbs resolved ACCUMULO-3088.
-----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Abandoned

Closing old inactive issue; if this is still a problem, please create a new 
issue or pull request at https://github.com/apache/accumulo

> StatsIterator readCounter could be more accurate
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3088
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Adam Fuchs
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: newbie
>
> When testing seek performance I noticed that the read count displayed on 
> Accumulo's monitor page registered zero entries read per second and a 
> positive number of entries per second returned. This should not be possible. 
> There is a fencepost error in the StatsIterator where seeks don't count as 
> entries read.
> Successful completion of this ticket should handle the cases where a seek 
> returns no entries, as well as where next is never called on an iterator.
> The cost of incrementing an AtomicLong is something like 10ns, which is at 
> least an order of magnitude more than the desired overhead. The current way 
> of batching updates to the read counter should be preserved for performance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to