ctubbsii commented on PR #5334: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5334#issuecomment-2770481402
> Looked into the namespace locking in detail. @ctubbsii I think you are right that we do not need to get a read lock on the source namespace. I opened #5442 as a more general change could be made around this premise. > > AFAICT these changes are locking namespaces in the exact same way as the old buggy code, am I getting that correct? It seems like the old code would only lock the destination namespace. If so there are no concerns w/ a clone fate that runs across bug fix releases doing odd things w/ namepace locks. I think I was wondering if they should be write locks because we're creating a table in the destination namespace. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@accumulo.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
