ddanielr commented on issue #448: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo-website/issues/448#issuecomment-2794666363
> I'm not sure what the problem is that you're reporting here. Yes, the docs are a subset of all the Java code. That is intentional, and fits our general theme of trying to document what we think is useful/relevant for users to know. I don't think there is any implication that the javadocs are comprehensive. The link directly from the Documentation page says `Javadocs (2.x)` and then underneath of that link is `Public API`. The link names suggest that the javadocs are complete as that next link is the subset of the public api. Once the page loads, it does say `Apache Accumulo Project 2.1.3 API` which is properly scoped but easy for someone to miss. > The javadoc jars published to Maven Central, however, are comprehensive, and I believe that's what powers javadoc.io. But, what a third party chooses to publish has no bearing on what we choose to publish. I'm not sure there's anything for us to fix here. I agree that 3rd parties have no impact on what we chose to publish. > Also, for what it's worth, the links on the downloads page refers to these as "Java API", which I think aligns nicely with the subset we're choosing to publish. So, I don't think there's anything to do for this issue. I agree that the download page verbiage is accurate. I think the issue is based on the page navigation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
