kevinrr888 commented on issue #5787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/5787#issuecomment-3192306549

   > I think the FatePoolsWatcherITBase.testIncrease1 has some issues. First, 
each test method has a variable allAssertsOccurred that is used in the finally 
block to check that each assertion was checked. I don't think this is necessary 
and it hides the actual error that causes the test to fail.
   
   @DomGarguilo fixed this with https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5790
   
   > Second issue, which I'm not quite sure how to fix at this point, is that 
PoolResizeTestRepo.isReady waits on a latch indefinitely. In testIncrease1 the 
configuration is changed which is supposed to shutdown the FateExecutor running 
the transactions. But the Fate transactions are blocked on the latch and don't 
shut down.
   
   This is intended and not an issue, this is to test that transaction runners 
are not stopped in the middle of executing a fate op when a shutdown/config 
change occurs. See this check:
   ```
         // The FateExecutor assigned to SET2 is no longer valid after the 
config change, so a
         // shutdown should be initiated and all the runners but the one 
working on a transaction
         // should be stopped.
         assertEquals(1, fate.getTxRunnersActive(set2));
   ```
   We later allow the work to complete and the shutdown to finish with
   ```
         // finish work
         env.isReadyLatch.countDown();
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@accumulo.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to