kevinrr888 commented on PR #6040: URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/6040#issuecomment-3750112858
> @kevinrr888 why did you choose to do this work in 2.1 instead of in main? Seems there is chance if introducing new bugs in scans or compactions. Also may make config that used to work stop working (that is probably a good thing overall as it can help detect existing problems, but could introduce temporary pain). I am not opposed to making this change in 2.1, but was just curious. @keith-turner I had already started this work in 2.1 with #5990 thinking this was a one-off issue with NewTableConfiguration. I did not anticipate follow on work requiring changes in as many areas, so continued with 2.1 learning the scope of the issue as I went. I also thought this validation would be good to have in the earliest version possible since it is essentially a bug. I would be fine refactoring this for main if we think this is too risky or undesired for 2.1. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
