[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571715#action_12571715
]
Xavier Hanin commented on IVY-741:
----------------------------------
I don't think we can simply drop the revision constraint actually used in favor
of the original version constraint, unless when you'd use the resolve mode
introduced by IVY-740. Indeed it would be difficult to understand why Ivy
picked version 1.3 of a component where the version constraint says
latest.integration, and when you know there is a version 1.4.
So what could be done is improve the xml report to store both the original and
delivered version constraint. Then in the graph we could indicate both using a
text convention. For instance it could be {{1.3 (latest.integration)}}.
What do you think?
> Enhance report task such that dependency graphs can show the original
> constraint rule on graph edges and resolved specific revision number on graph
> nodes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IVY-741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-741
> Project: Ivy
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Shawn Castrianni
>
> After IVY-739 is resolved, ivy will have new metadata that keeps the
> "original constraint rule" metadata in published/delivered ivy files. This
> can be used to enhance the report task. Right now, if you run the report,
> you can see the dependency constraint rules for the direct dependencies of
> the module you are reporting on, but all of the indirect (transitive)
> dependencies are hardcoded to their specific resolved revision numbers.
> Having this extra metadata could allow the report task to put the original
> dependency constraint rules on all the edges in the graph and the resolved
> specific revision numbers inside all of the nodes like it has now. In my
> opinion, that is a better report of the dependencies of a module. It shows
> the constraint rule used and the actual revision found for all nodes in the
> graph.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.