[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12767923#action_12767923
]
Jon Schneider edited comment on IVY-1135 at 10/20/09 7:57 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I think you mean to say that foo.bar should have a conf of "A->a" not "a",
which of course resolves the "a" conf in foo.bar's module descriptor.
Furthermore, if defaultconfmapping="A->a;B->b" and defaultconf="A->b", I think
that the conf of foo.bar should be inlined to "A->b".
I agree that the combination of these properties makes a lot of sense. I also
assumed this was the intended behavior until I read the docs more carefully.
was (Author: jkschneider):
I think you mean to say that foo.bar should have a conf of "A->a" not "a",
which of course resolves the "a" conf in foo.bar's module descriptor. I agree
this makes a lot of sense.
> still use defaultconf when defaultconfmapping is defined
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IVY-1135
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1135
> Project: Ivy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0
> Reporter: Stephen Haberman
>
> Per this forum post:
> http://www.nabble.com/defaultconf-and-defaultconfmapping-td25582330.html#a25582330
> I think it would be possible (and more intuitive) if defaultconf and
> defaultconfmapping could be used at the same time.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
