https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086
--- Comment #3 from Paul Scott <[email protected]> --- I found that granularity="-90000" (with a negative sign) produces better results, in that the file gets copied, but then it gets repeatedly copied until the granularity value expires; it also causes "modified in the future" warning message. But at least this confirms that file.lastModified() is returning a value that doesn't represent the full granularity of the modified time. The file variable represents a java.o.File object. I am wondering if updating the JVM will fix this problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
