MilkWangStudio commented on issue #8423: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/8423#issuecomment-1375315186
> The main point is not whether it is "cache server" or "integrate with storage solutions". The main point is if it is worth doing this job (💰💰💰 ). If we have an infinite budget, we can provide anything people like. But as we don't have one, we need to consider the ROI. I think you're right, apisix is a opensource project, it should focus on gateway rather than cache. On the other hand, I have a requirement to develop common cache server now. I code a min demo with spring cloud gateway to implement cache server. It has some basic features. like dynamic api config, double cache, cache update strategy etc. now the call link is : client -> apisix(auth) -> cacheServer -> dataApi -> db I want to develop a apisix-plugin to replace cacheServer. I think the difficulty may be to integrate middleware in apisix. For example, the memory update is triggered by mq. Without considering the cost, do you think it's a good idea to implement a better cache-proxy plugin? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
