pioneer-hash commented on issue #403: URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix-ingress-controller/issues/403#issuecomment-826272255
> > > No, it's not related with the order to create these to objects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The error log prompts that there is an `ApisixUpstream` object in the `default` namespace which named as `web2`. You should check it. > > > > > > I'm sure not. The puzzle is that a reference to ApisixRoute will succeed in ApisixUpstream > > So here we have two problems. Let's solve them one by one. > > The first problem the apisix upstream is ineffective is because the corresponding service doesn't exist, this is a conclusion from your error log. I'm not sure whether this apisixupstream object was deleted so you said you are sure it doesn't exist. Previously, I set up this service called web2 in the default namespace ，Maybe I set up an ApisixUpstrem called web2. This has now been removed, and later apisixUpstreams have been created to specify the gray-ns namespace -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
