[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15404360#comment-15404360
 ] 

Chen Li edited comment on ASTERIXDB-1556 at 8/2/16 5:03 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

It seems to be a bug?  A correct implementation should consider the memory 
budget of the operator to set the size of the hash table?

[~wangsaeu] Minor suggestion on your Jira comments: it will be good to format 
the code nicely using a special Jira syntax.


was (Author: [email protected]):
It seems to be a bug?  A correct implementation should consider the memory 
budget of the operator set the size of the hash table?

[~wangsaeu] Minor suggestion on your Jira comments: it will be good to format 
the code nicely using a special Jira syntax.

> Prefix-based multi-way Fuzzy-join generates an exception.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-1556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Taewoo Kim
>            Assignee: Taewoo Kim
>         Attachments: 2wayjoin.pdf, 2wayjoin.rtf, 2wayjoinplan.rtf, 
> 3wayjoin.pdf, 3wayjoin.rtf, 3wayjoinplan.rtf
>
>
> When we enable prefix-based fuzzy-join and apply the multi-way fuzzy-join ( > 
> 2), the system generates an out-of-memory exception. 
> Since a fuzzy-join is created using 30-40 lines of AQL codes and this AQL is 
> translated into massive number of operators (more than 200 operators in the 
> plan for a 3-way fuzzy join), it could generate out-of-memory exception.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to