[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15415446#comment-15415446
 ] 

Chen Li commented on ASTERIXDB-1556:
------------------------------------

Interesting results.  I will talk to Taewoo and Jianfeng to discuss the 
details.  Just curious we can do "#2. ..... If hash table size becomes huge, 
then we need to resolve the problem within the hash table itself. For instance, 
we can keep track of how much spaces are wasted due to a hash slot migration. 
And we can come up with a garbage collection method."  It may need another F2F 
discussion.


> Hash Table used by External hash group-by doesn't conform to the budget.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-1556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1556
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Taewoo Kim
>            Assignee: Taewoo Kim
>         Attachments: 2wayjoin.pdf, 2wayjoin.rtf, 2wayjoinplan.rtf, 
> 3wayjoin.pdf, 3wayjoin.rtf, 3wayjoinplan.rtf
>
>
> When we enable prefix-based fuzzy-join and apply the multi-way fuzzy-join ( > 
> 2), the system generates an out-of-memory exception. 
> Since a fuzzy-join is created using 30-40 lines of AQL codes and this AQL is 
> translated into massive number of operators (more than 200 operators in the 
> plan for a 3-way fuzzy join), it could generate out-of-memory exception.
> /// Update: as the discussion goes, we found that hash table in the external 
> hash group by doesn't conform to the frame limit. So, an out of memory 
> exception happens during the execution of an external hash group by operator.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to