[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15426957#comment-15426957
 ] 

Till commented on ASTERIXDB-1589:
---------------------------------

Don't have a strong opinion. Looking at current version of the tutorial [1] we 
either separate word by '-' or by '.'. And I'm also not aware how other systems 
refer to their proxies. But it seems that they usually are explicit about the 
fact that they are http proxies. So I would have either chosen 
"http.proxy.address" and "http.proxy.port" or just used "http-proxy" and the 
usual "address:port" notation in the value.

[~idleft] : Do you have thoughts on this?

[1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/feeds/tutorial.html

> Proxy parameters for TwitterFeed
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-1589
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1589
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: AsterixDB, Feeds
>            Reporter: Wail Alkowaileet
>            Assignee: Wail Alkowaileet
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> TwitterFeed currently doesn't run if AsterixDB is behind a proxy.
> I want to extend TwitterFeed config parameters to accept ``proxy-address`` 
> and ``proxy-port``. 
> I just want to get the approval if the parameters' names are fine.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to