Jianfeng Jia has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: Fix for ASTERIXDB-1636
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

(1 comment)

I think maybe Taewoo knows better about the changes.

Do we have some sort of unit test for storage codes? this kind of issue is 
impossible to be detected by AQL test.

https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1205/4/asterixdb/asterix-metadata/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/metadata/declared/AqlMetadataProvider.java
File 
asterixdb/asterix-metadata/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/metadata/declared/AqlMetadataProvider.java:

Line 1956:                 filterFields[0] = (numTokenFields + 
primaryKeys.size()) - 1;
why minus 1?


-- 
To view, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/1205
To unsubscribe, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib4bc413fcda9a5c98ae57f94e1c8a68fe9aacda3
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Project: asterixdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Ian Maxon <ima...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ian Maxon <ima...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins <jenk...@fulliautomatix.ics.uci.edu>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jianfeng Jia <jianfeng....@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Taewoo Kim <wangs...@yahoo.com>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to