[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16625900#comment-16625900
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ASTERIXDB-2174:
------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 36e20b78bb1584538c9844e2e7398eacf8dd3fb8 in asterixdb's branch 
refs/heads/master from luochen01
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=asterixdb.git;h=36e20b7 ]

[ASTERIXDB-2174] Use ListSet when clone partition property

- user model changes: no
- storage format changes: no
- interface changes: no

Details:
- Use ListSet instead of HashSet when cloning partitioning properties
to ensure it has the consistent behavior as before.

Change-Id: Ib2b8c1715d75b387a73504f4709524d9ab9ce123
Reviewed-on: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/2968
Sonar-Qube: Jenkins <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jenkins <[email protected]>
Integration-Tests: Jenkins <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Lychagin <[email protected]>


> Improve partitioning property propagation in 
> AbstractPreclusteredGroupByPOperator
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-2174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-2174
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: COMP - Compiler
>            Reporter: Dmitry Lychagin
>            Assignee: Dmitry Lychagin
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently AbstractPreclusteredGroupByPOperator propagates its input 
> partitioning property as is. For example if "gby var1 as var2" and input is 
> partitioned on "var1" the output partitioning would also be reported on 
> "var1". The problem is that "var1" is not visible after the group by. The 
> variable in the output partitioning property should be changed from "var1" to 
> "var2" because both these variables are bound to the same value and "var2" is 
> visible after the group by.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to