[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16067374#comment-16067374
]
Ian Maxon commented on ASTERIXDB-1952:
--------------------------------------
This is partially fixed but there is still a hole that will be fixed relating
to upsert where the filter may obscure some upserted tuples when the new value
has a different value for the filtered field.
> Filters are not properly reconstructed during recovery
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERIXDB-1952
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1952
> Project: Apache AsterixDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ian Maxon
> Assignee: Ian Maxon
>
> The redo process does not reconstruct the state of the in-memory component's
> filter right now. Basically it lacks the knowledge of either the metadata to
> extract this info, or the extra explicitly logged information. This causes
> the disk components created during recovery to have essentially bogus data
> for the filter values.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
