Till Westmann has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: [ASTERIXDB-2115] Add Component Ids to LSM Indexes
......................................................................


Patch Set 50: Code-Review+1

(4 comments)

Looks good to me, only cosmetic comments/questions.

https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2025/50/asterixdb/asterix-app/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/app/translator/QueryTranslator.java
File 
asterixdb/asterix-app/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/app/translator/QueryTranslator.java:

PS50, Line 996: for internal dataset
One "internal dataset" too many?


https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2025/50/asterixdb/asterix-common/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/common/context/CorrelatedPrefixMergePolicy.java
File 
asterixdb/asterix-common/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/common/context/CorrelatedPrefixMergePolicy.java:

PS50, Line 102:     /**
              :      * Submit merge requests for all disk components within 
[minID, maxID]
              :      * of all indexes of a given dataset in the given partition
              :      *
              :      * @param minID
              :      * @param maxID
              :      * @param partition
              :      * @param indexInfos
              :      * @throws HyracksDataException
              :      */
fix the javadocs?


https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2025/50/hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-storage-am-lsm-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/storage/am/lsm/common/api/ILSMComponentId.java
File 
hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-storage-am-lsm-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/storage/am/lsm/common/api/ILSMComponentId.java:

PS50, Line 38: notFound
Would it be correct to call this "invalid" instead?


https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/2025/50/hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-storage-am-lsm-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/storage/am/lsm/common/impls/LSMComponentId.java
File 
hyracks-fullstack/hyracks/hyracks-storage-am-lsm-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hyracks/storage/am/lsm/common/impls/LSMComponentId.java:

PS50, Line 29: MISSING_COMPONENT_ID
Would it be correct to call this "invalid"? Or is "missing" more appropriate?


-- 
To view, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/2025
To unsubscribe, visit https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8aec6261a84a0729ce35f4b1cb708be299ddb98d
Gerrit-PatchSet: 50
Gerrit-Project: asterixdb
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Luo Chen <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anon. E. Moose #1000171
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dmitry Lychagin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ian Maxon <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ildar Absalyamov <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Luo Chen <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Till Westmann <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: abdullah alamoudi <[email protected]>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to