rbowen commented on code in PR #189: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/189#discussion_r1821177979
########## source/newpmcmember.md: ########## @@ -55,117 +84,29 @@ becomes obvious that we should invite them. This encourages them and keeps them enthusiastic. If we leave it too long, then we risk them becoming disillusioned. -On the `private@` list we can each say exactly what we feel about each person, -with no holds barred. Keep the discussion concise. The praise part can -be done later in public. Keep in mind, however, that if the member becomes -a PMC member later, they will have access to this discussion. - Let the Vote thread run for one week. -A positive result is achieved by **Consensus Approval**: at least 3 +1 -votes and no vetoes. +A positive result is achieved by **Consensus Approval**: more +1 votes +than -1 votes. Review Comment: Ok. I think there is also some disagreement whether one individual can veto a PMC/Committer vote. I strongly believe that they can not, and should not, be able to do so. And that phrasing is, I believe, at odds with advice we give elsewhere. Will adjust accordingly, but I welcome discussion. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
