Nick Vatamaniuc created COUCHDB-2833:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Replicator client doesn't handle un-expectedly closed 
pipelined connections well
                 Key: COUCHDB-2833
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2833
             Project: CouchDB
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: public (Regular issues)
          Components: Database Core
            Reporter: Nick Vatamaniuc


This was found investigating the failure of replication tests. Specifically 
couch_replicator_large_atts_tests, the {local, remote} sub-case.

The test sets up push replications from local to remote.

Replication workers  have more than 1 document larger than 
MAX_BULK_ATT_SIZE=64K.  They start pushing them to the target, using a 
keep-alive connection (default  for HTTP 1.1), the first few pipelined requests 
will go through using the same connection, then server will accept the first 
PUT to …/docid?edits=false, then return Connection:close and close the 
connection after the 201 Created result.  Workers don't expect that, and try to 
do another PUT on same connection. And then crash on ibrowser's 
connection_closing error, which they don't handle. That causes the whole async 
replication process to exit.

Potentially there are 2 issues.

couch_replicator_http layer needs to handle this case better. On closing error, 
shut down the socket quickly and then retry. (Not shutting it down and retrying 
means retrying for at least 5 or so seconds until something cleans up that 
connection state).

Adding this clause to couch_replicator_httpc.erl seems to do the trick:

{code}
process_response({error,connection_closing}, Worker, HttpDb, Params, _Cb)->
    couch_log:notice("Connection closed by server. Closing the socket and 
trying again",[]),
    ibrowse_http_client:stop(Worker),
    throw({retry, HttpDb, Params});
{code}


Another issue is to make the server not close the connection after first PUT to 
.../db/docid/new_edits=false when using pipeline connections.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to