pzduniak commented on issue #1341: CouchDB degrades and starts timeouting on 
all index operations
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/1341#issuecomment-392004915
 
 
   >CouchDB is designed to run on beefy servers and CouchDB 2.x especially so.
   
   Huh, my bad then, seems like the applications that I've worked on where 
Couch's replication was the perfect solution (replication over intermittent 
connectivity on "edge deployments" and stuff like that) weren't what the 
project was made for. Looks like PouchDB took over that role after it matured?
   
   >That doesn’t mean it can also run on low-spec hardware, but the defaults 
are not set that way (unless you follow one of the documented setup paths, 
which you aren't).
   
   Do you mean 
http://docs.couchdb.org/en/2.1.1/config/query-servers.html#query_server_config/os_process_limit?
 I'm struggling to find anything else.
   
   As much as being overly PC conflicts my nature (and culture!), whatever, I 
can do that. Thank you for maintaining the project, I wish you didn't jump to a 
Code of Conduct as soon as you see something that you don't like. Just correct 
the person instead of making threats (of _a notice_). No one's trying to attack 
you, no one is trying to undermine your competence. Different people talk in 
different ways, in the end we all want mostly the same thing.
   
   Oh, also, writing a paragraph about your issue workflow might be useful for 
the CONTRIBUTING.md - I'm used to issues staying open until either of the sides 
marks them as resolved, unless they're blatantly invalid (or duplicate).
   
   EDIT: That got lost in a few iterations of the comment trying to be PC: 
sorry if you felt attacked, I usually don't deal with projects with such a 
strict CoC (if any, usually meritocracy is sufficient).
   
   EDIT2: Oh wow, I just realized how you interpreted my comments. I'm talking 
about the code. Not about you. Code. I'm surprised by how the code works. Not 
your comments. The comment about accepting behavior was about the code too. And 
by closing the issue I feel like you "accept" it. It's a bug for me - it may 
not be for you. That's cool, I'm not the maintainer, you have the power. I got 
that it's by design (or lack of safety guards for an edge case), there's no 
point in offending me too :^)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to