wohali commented on a change in pull request #275: Add FAQ
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-documentation/pull/275#discussion_r203383179
 
 

 ##########
 File path: src/faq/troubleshooting.rst
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
+.. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not
+.. use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy 
of
+.. the License at
+..
+..   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+..
+.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+.. distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
+.. WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
+.. License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations 
under
+.. the License.
+
+.. _faq/troubleshooting:
+
+===============
+Troubleshooting
+===============
+
+Where are the CouchDB log files located?
+----------------------------------------
+
+For a default Linux/Unix installation the log files are located here::
+
+    /usr/local/var/log/couchdb/couch.log
+
+This is set in the default.ini file located here::
+
+    /etc/couchdb/default.ini
+
+If you've installed from source and are running CouchDB in dev mode the log
+files are located here::
+
+    YOUR-COUCHDB-SOURCE-DIRECTORY/tmp/log/couch.log
+
+How do I use transactions with CouchDB?
+---------------------------------------
+
+CouchDB uses an "optimistic concurrency" model. In the simplest terms, this
+just means that you send a document version along with your update, and CouchDB
+rejects the change if the current document version doesn't match what you've
+sent.
+
+It's deceptively simple, really. You can reframe many normal transaction based
+scenarios for CouchDB. You do need to sort of throw out your RDBMS domain
+knowledge when learning CouchDB, though. It's helpful to approach problems from
+a higher level, rather than attempting to mold Couch to a SQL based world.
+
+**Keeping track of inventory**
+
+The problem you outlined is primarily an inventory issue. If you have a 
document
+describing an item, and it includes a field for "quantity available", you can
+handle concurrency issues like this:
+
+- Retrieve the document, take note of the `_rev` property that CouchDB sends
+  along
+- Decrement the quantity field, if it's greater than zero
+- Send the updated document back, using the `_rev` property
+- If the `_rev` matches the currently stored number, be done!
+- If there's a conflict (when `_rev` doesn't match), retrieve the newest
+  document version
+
+In this instance, there are two possible failure scenarios to think about. If
+the most recent document version has a quantity of 0, you handle it just like
+you would in a RDBMS and alert the user that they can't actually buy what they
+wanted to purchase. If the most recent document version has a quantity greater
+than 0, you simply repeat the operation with the updated data, and start back
+at the beginning. This forces you to do a bit more work than an RDBMS would, 
and
+could get a little annoying if there are frequent, conflicting updates.
+
+Now, the answer I just gave presupposes that you're going to do things in
+CouchDB in much the same way that you would in an RDBMS. I might approach this
+problem a bit differently:
+
+I'd start with a "master product" document that includes all the descriptor 
data
+(name, picture, description, price, etc). Then I'd add an "inventory ticket"
+document for each specific instance, with fields for product_key and 
claimed_by.
+If you're selling a model of hammer, and have 20 of them to sell, you might 
have
+documents with keys like hammer-1, hammer-2, etc, to represent each available
+hammer.
+
+Then, I'd create a view that gives me a list of available hammers, with a 
reduce
+function that lets me see a "total". These are completely off the cuff, but
+should give you an idea of what a working view would look like.
+
+**Map**::
+
+    function(doc)
+    {
+        if (doc.type == 'inventory_ticket' && doc.claimed_by == null ) {
+            emit(doc.product_key, { 'inventory_ticket' :doc.id, '_rev' : 
doc._rev });
+        }
+    }
+
+This gives me a list of available "tickets", by product key. I could grab a
+group of these when someone wants to buy a hammer, then iterate through sending
+updates (using the id and _rev) until I successfully claim one (previously
+claimed tickets will result in an update error).
+
+**Reduce**::
+
+    function (keys, values, combine) {
+        return values.length;
+    }
+
+This reduce function simply returns the total number of unclaimed
+inventory_ticket items, so you can tell how many "hammers" are available for
+purchase.
+
+**Caveats**
+
+This solution represents roughly 3.5 minutes of total thinking for the
+particular problem you've presented. There may be better ways of doing this!
+That said, it does substantially reduce conflicting updates, and cuts down on
+the need to respond to a conflict with a new update. Under this model, you 
won't
+have multiple users attempting to change data in primary product entry. At the
+very worst, you'll have multiple users attempting to claim a single ticket, and
+if you've grabbed several of those from your view, you simply move on to the
+next ticket and try again.
+
+.. note::
+    This FAQ entry was borrowed from
+    
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/299723/can-i-do-transactions-and-locks-in-couchdb
+    with permission from the author
+
+Why does creating my view take so long?
 
 Review comment:
   "Javascript view"
   
   At some point we need to go through the documentation (and consult with 
user@ and dev@ mailing lists) to standardize on the jumble of JS View, Mango 
Index, and the more suitable generic term "secondary index".

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to