AlexanderKaraberov commented on a change in pull request #1195: Add support for 
bulk get with Accept:"multipart/mixed" or "multipart/related"
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1195#discussion_r232206895
 
 

 ##########
 File path: src/chttpd/src/chttpd_db.erl
 ##########
 @@ -476,19 +477,59 @@ db_req(#httpd{method='POST', path_parts=[_, 
<<"_bulk_get">>]}=Req, Db) ->
             #doc_query_args{
                 options = Options
             } = bulk_get_parse_doc_query(Req),
-
-            {ok, Resp} = start_json_response(Req, 200),
-            send_chunk(Resp, <<"{\"results\": [">>),
-
-            lists:foldl(fun(Doc, Sep) ->
-                {DocId, Results, Options1} = bulk_get_open_doc_revs(Db, Doc,
-                                                                    Options),
-                bulk_get_send_docs_json(Resp, DocId, Results, Options1, Sep),
-                <<",">>
-            end, <<"">>, Docs),
-
-            send_chunk(Resp, <<"]}">>),
-            end_json_response(Resp)
+            % Decide whether to use multipart response or application/json
+            AcceptMixedMp = MochiReq:accepts_content_type("multipart/mixed"),
+            AcceptRelatedMp = 
MochiReq:accepts_content_type("multipart/related"),
+            AcceptMp = AcceptMixedMp orelse AcceptRelatedMp,
+            case AcceptMp of
+               false ->
+                  {ok, Resp} = start_json_response(Req, 200),
+                  send_chunk(Resp, <<"{\"results\": [">>),
+                  lists:foldl(fun(Doc, Sep) ->
+                      {DocId, Results, Options1} = bulk_get_open_doc_revs(Db, 
Doc,
+                                                                          
Options),
+                      bulk_get_send_docs_json(Resp, DocId, Results, Options1, 
Sep),
+                      <<",">>
+                  end, <<"">>, Docs),
+                  send_chunk(Resp, <<"]}">>),
+                  end_json_response(Resp);
+               true ->
+                  OuterBoundary = bulk_get_multipart_boundary(),
+                  MpType = case AcceptMixedMp of
+                      true ->
+                          "multipart/mixed";
+                      _ ->
+                          "multipart/related"
+                  end,
+                  CType = {"Content-Type", MpType ++ "; boundary=\"" ++
+                                        ?b2l(OuterBoundary) ++  "\""},
+                  {ok, Resp} = start_chunked_response(Req, 200, [CType]),
+                  lists:foldl(fun(Doc, _Pre) ->
+                      case bulk_get_open_doc_revs(Db, Doc, Options) of
+                          {_, {ok, []}, _Options1} ->
+                              ok;
+                          {_, {ok, Results}, Options1} ->
+                              send_docs_multipart(bulk_get, Req, Results, 
Options1,
+                                                  OuterBoundary, Resp);
+                          {DocId, {error, {RevId, Error, Reason}}, _Options1} 
->
+                              Json = ?JSON_ENCODE({[{<<"id">>, DocId},
+                                                    {<<"rev">>, RevId},
+                                                    {<<"error">>, Error},
+                                                    {<<"reason">>, Reason}]}),
+                              couch_httpd:send_chunk(Resp,
+                                  [<<"\r\n--", OuterBoundary/binary>>,
+                                  <<"\r\nContent-Type: application/json; 
error=\"true\"\r\n\r\n">>,
+                                  Json])
+                      end
+                  end, <<"">>, Docs),
+                  case Docs of
+                      [] ->
+                          ok;
+                      _ ->
+                          couch_httpd:send_chunk(Resp, <<"\r\n", "--", 
OuterBoundary/binary, "--\r\n">>)
+                  end,
+            couch_httpd:last_chunk(Resp)
 
 Review comment:
   @nickva Actually it won't. This call is a part of multipart case clause. 
Misapprehension in this case again was caused by a poor formatting style. I've 
addressed this and put a proper indentation to the whole clause.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to