Github user jaydoane commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-ets-lru/pull/7
Since the topic is access and creation time comparison for purposes of
cache eviction, it doesn't seem important whether or not those values are
monotonically increasing, nor particularly accurate. I also noted that
`os:timestamp/0` is already used a
[couple](https://github.com/apache/couchdb-ets-lru/blob/master/src/ets_lru.erl#L278)
[places](https://github.com/apache/couchdb-ets-lru/blob/master/src/ets_lru.erl#L321)
in the existing code. However, based on the manual, perhaps we should
consistently change them all to `erlang:timestamp/0`?
---
