iilyak commented on a change in pull request #1789: New Feature: Database
Partitions
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1789#discussion_r242716878
##########
File path: src/fabric/src/fabric_view.erl
##########
@@ -309,10 +317,26 @@ index_of(X, [X|_Rest], I) ->
index_of(X, [_|Rest], I) ->
index_of(X, Rest, I+1).
-get_shards(DbName, #mrargs{stable=true}) ->
- mem3:ushards(DbName);
-get_shards(DbName, #mrargs{stable=false}) ->
- mem3:shards(DbName).
+get_shards(Db, #mrargs{} = Args) ->
+ DbPartitioned = fabric_util:is_partitioned(Db),
+ Partition = couch_mrview_util:get_extra(Args, partition),
+ if DbPartitioned orelse Partition == undefined -> ok; true ->
+ throw({bad_request, <<"partition specified on non-partitioned db">>})
+ end,
+ DbName = fabric:dbname(Db),
+ % Decide which version of mem3:shards/1,2 or
+ % mem3:ushards/1,2 to use for the current
+ % request.
+ case {Args#mrargs.stable, Partition} of
+ {true, undefined} ->
+ mem3:ushards(DbName);
+ {true, Partition} ->
+ mem3:ushards(DbName, <<Partition/binary, ":foo">>);
+ {false, undefined} ->
+ mem3:shards(DbName);
+ {false, Partition} ->
+ mem3:shards(DbName, <<Partition/binary, ":foo">>)
Review comment:
Can we add couch_partition:range_key/1 or partition_key/1?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
