> but the office doc describe like this > > ``` > <!-- 用rest协议在8080端口暴露服务 --> > <dubbo:protocol name="rest" port="8080"/> > > <!-- 声明需要暴露的服务接口 --> > <dubbo:service interface="xxx.UserService" ref="userService"/> > > <!-- 和本地bean一样实现服务 --> > <bean id="userService" class="xxx.UserServiceImpl" /> > ``` > Make it easy for us to make mistakes， i think if posibble,the dubbo:registry > should be removed. > What do you think? Two thinkings here. 1) If the dubbo:registry is removed, the service will not be registered to anywhere. How can a consumer of the service get the addresses? by static DNS? or some other way?
2) If the dubbo:registry is removed, a default registry will be used. What‘s the default? I think it is hard to choose a default behavior for Dubbo because of its open and versatility. A product based Dubbo can extend to implement the default one according the specific scenario. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/2707 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
