> Could you provide a minimal demo that can reproduce the problem?@beiwei30 > @jasonjoo2010
After some research I found that it's better to abandon this feature. And we use alternative way to achieve similar configuration by using dubbo.registries and dubbo.registry together. Though they are not documented too. (Maybe examples of "dubbo.properties" under several typical scenarios is necessary in document or how-tos) Why I say it's better to abandon the legacy multiple registries support using the form "registry1|registry2" is because it leads to multiple RegistryConfig beans and may break the design of current protocol. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/dubbo/issues/1725 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
