arvindshmicrosoft commented on pull request #356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo-muchos/pull/356#issuecomment-657956693


   Thank you @keith-turner, appreciate your review. Re: the 2 points you 
mentioned:
   1. Agreed, it should now be possible to just use the nameservice_id instead 
of the namenode[0]. I will push up an update.
   2. The secondary namenode was working fine previously, just that it would 
place its data into a location under /tmp (as specified in 
[hdfs-default.xml](http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-hdfs/hdfs-default.xml).
 Consequently, `muchos wipe` would not clean up this folder, and I had noticed 
some weird problems between setup / wipe / setup cycles. Now that it is placed 
under the worker_data_dirs, the `wipe` command does clean its contents up.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to