This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

ddekany pushed a commit to branch 2.3-gae
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/freemarker.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/2.3-gae by this push:
     new 9e45172  (Version history fixes)
9e45172 is described below

commit 9e45172c95720a19af9aa3566265e2af1957df5e
Author: ddekany <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Thu Oct 24 00:30:10 2019 +0200

    (Version history fixes)
---
 src/manual/en_US/book.xml | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/manual/en_US/book.xml b/src/manual/en_US/book.xml
index b680afc..6675af5 100644
--- a/src/manual/en_US/book.xml
+++ b/src/manual/en_US/book.xml
@@ -28856,17 +28856,6 @@ TemplateModel x = env.getVariable("x");  // get 
variable x</programlisting>
               arguments uniformly, like for example to pass the arguments to
               
<literal>?spread_args(<replaceable>...</replaceable>)</literal>.</para>
             </listitem>
-          </itemizedlist>
-        </section>
-
-        <section>
-          <title>Changes on the Java side</title>
-
-          <itemizedlist>
-            <listitem>
-              <para>Added
-              
<literal>Environment.getDataModelOrSharedVariable(String)</literal>.</para>
-            </listitem>
 
             <listitem>
               <para><link linkend="ref.directive.macro">Macro catch-all
@@ -28885,6 +28874,17 @@ TemplateModel x = env.getVariable("x");  // get 
variable x</programlisting>
               Fortunately it's very unlikely that anyone wanted to use lambdas
               there (given the few built-ins that accept lambdas).</para>
             </listitem>
+          </itemizedlist>
+        </section>
+
+        <section>
+          <title>Changes on the Java side</title>
+
+          <itemizedlist>
+            <listitem>
+              <para>Added
+              
<literal>Environment.getDataModelOrSharedVariable(String)</literal>.</para>
+            </listitem>
 
             <listitem>
               <para>Bug fixed: AST traversal API now can properly traverse the

Reply via email to