[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17134814#comment-17134814
 ] 

Dániel Dékány edited comment on FREEMARKER-145 at 6/13/20, 2:20 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

OK, I see what they did. {{java.bean.Introspector}} was always kind of broken, 
as in a situation like this, prior to Java 9 (so probably for 20+ years), it 
gave back both variation of the property read method (of {{getParent()}} here). 
That was, I believe, just a Java bug, because actually you can't directly call 
the overloaded method from a non-public class (causes 
{{java.lang.IllegalAccessException}}). Hence the accessible method filtering 
you see in FreeMarker; it filters out the method variation that you can't call, 
replacing it with the one that you can. Now, with Java 9 they managed to make 
{{java.bean.Inrospector}} even more broken, because now it only gives back a 
single method out of the two... But not the right one, but the one that you 
can't call. So, yeah, has to code in even more {{java.bean.Inrospector}} bug 
workarounds.


was (Author: ddekany):
OK, I see what they did. {{java.bean.Introspector}} was always kind of broken, 
as in a situation like this, prior to Java 9 (so probably for 20+ years), it 
gave back both variation of the property read method (of {{getPath()}} here). 
That was, I believe, just a Java bug, because actually you can't directly call 
the overloaded method from a non-public class (causes 
{{java.lang.IllegalAccessException}}). Hence the accessible method filtering 
you see in FreeMarker; it filters out the method variation that you can't call, 
replacing it with the one that you can. Now, with Java 9 they managed to make 
{{java.bean.Inrospector}} even more broken, because now it only gives back a 
single method out of the two... But not the right one, but the one that you 
can't call. So, yeah, has to code in even more {{java.bean.Inrospector}} bug 
workarounds.

> Can't access nio Path.getParent() in templates
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FREEMARKER-145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-145
>             Project: Apache Freemarker
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: engine
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.30
>            Reporter: Alfio Gloria
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: freemarkertest.zip
>
>
> When using something like ${data.path.parent} freemarker throws an exception 
> "The following has evaluated to null or missing" (obviously on a path that 
> has non null parent).
> After some investigation i figured out that freemarker does not recognize 
> getParent() as a valid bean method.
> This seems due to a condition in ClassIntrospector, line 827:
> if (am.getReturnType() == m.getReturnType())
> where
> am.getReturnType() -> java.nio.file.Path
> m.getReturnType() -> sun.nio.fs.UnixPath
> I don't know the rationale of the aforementioned condition but it seems weird 
> to me that I can reference a Path object with ${data.path} but not with 
> ${data.path.parent} since they are both sun.nio.fs.UnixPath objects



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to