[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17804693#comment-17804693
]
Dániel Dékány commented on FREEMARKER-183:
------------------------------------------
This is how it is at the moment:
[https://github.com/apache/freemarker/tree/FREEMARKER-183]
Instead of solely focusing on records, I have added two new settings to
`BeansWrapper`/`DefaultObjectWrapper`: `ZeroArgumentNonVoidMethodPolicy
nonRecordZeroArgumentNonVoidMethodPolicy`, and
`ZeroArgumentNonVoidMethodPolicy recordZeroArgumentNonVoidMethodPolicy`. Then,
if `incomplatibleImprovement` set to 2.3.33,
`recordZeroArgumentNonVoidMethodPolicy` defaults to `BOTH_PROPERTY_AND_METHOD`
(so then `obj.foo`, and `obj.foo()` will do the same). If someone wants to go
for the less backward compatible but cleaner approach, they can chose
`PROPERTY_ONLY` for the same.
> Add support for Java records
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: FREEMARKER-183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-183
> Project: Apache Freemarker
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Dániel Dékány
> Assignee: Dániel Dékány
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently we don't support records (JEP 395), which was finalized in Java 16.
> Users can extend {{DefaultObjectWrapper}} for that of course, but it should
> be supported out of the box.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
